| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
lmb reserve is used to reserve some memory so that when loading images
(like kernel, dtb, initrd), images won't be loaded into the reserved memory.
The problem in current lmb is it does not handle the overlap case. When adding
a new reserved memory, if the memory region is overlap with regions already been
added in lmb, it will fail. One example is reserved memory in DTB may overlap with
u-boot relocate address. lmb reserves the u-boot relocate address firstly, so when
adding reserved memory from DTB, we will meet failure.
Actually if we handle the overlap case, we can resolve the overlap by using a max
common region for the overlap regions. So that this case won't fail.
However, u-boot has some places to use the lmb_reserve when allocating memory in
loading images. If we allowed overlap in this function, it means images loading
address can overlap each other and cause the address check mechanism not work.
So add another function to allow overlap and only use it for fdt reserved-memory
nodes. The FDT reserved-memory is ok to merge with other reserved memory, since
this won't break image loading address check.
Signed-off-by: Ye Li <ye.li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
(cherry picked from commit 37d86c68816dffde3dc8dcda5b9d67a195b2f9c2)
(cherry picked from commit e82c6616d5bf03c16195333fa1e93bd713e68ed9)
(cherry picked from commit 3cee7525366e27ce4a3dc9706cb857204eb47ae1)
|
|
In case U-Boot starts with GD_FLG_SKIP_RELOC, the U-Boot code is
not relocated, however the stack and heap is at the end of DRAM
after relocation. Reserve a LMB area for the non-relocated U-Boot
code so it won't be overwritten.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Add a host Kconfig for OF_LIBFDT. With this we can use
CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_LIBFDT) directly in the tools build, so drop the
unnecessary indirection.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
The arc/arm/m68k/microblaze/mips/ppc arch_lmb_reserve() implementations
are all mostly the same, except for a couple of details. Implement a
generic arch_lmb_reserve_generic() function which can be parametrized
enough to cater for those differences between architectures. This can
also be parametrized enough so it can handle cases where U-Boot is not
relocated to the end of DRAM e.g. because there is some other reserved
memory past U-Boot (e.g. unmovable firmware for coprocessor), it is not
relocated at all, and other such use cases.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Cc: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
Cc: Hai Pham <hai.pham.ud@renesas.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Add lmb_dump_region() function, to simplify lmb_dump_all_force().
This patch is based on Linux memblock dump function.
An example of bdinfo output is:
.....
fdt_size = 0x000146a0
FB base = 0xfdd00000
lmb_dump_all:
memory.cnt = 0x1
memory[0] [0xc0000000-0xffffffff], 0x40000000 bytes flags: 0
reserved.cnt = 0x6
reserved[0] [0x10000000-0x10045fff], 0x00046000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[1] [0x30000000-0x3003ffff], 0x00040000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[2] [0x38000000-0x3800ffff], 0x00010000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[3] [0xe8000000-0xefffffff], 0x08000000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[4] [0xfbaea344-0xfdffffff], 0x02515cbc bytes flags: 0
reserved[5] [0xfe000000-0xffffffff], 0x02000000 bytes flags: 4
arch_number = 0x00000000
TLB addr = 0xfdff0000
....
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a new function lmb_is_reserved_flags to check if
an address is reserved with a specific flags.
This function can be used to check if an address was
reserved with no-map flags with:
lmb_is_reserved_flags(lmb, addr, LMB_NOMAP);
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
|
|
Add "flags" in lmb_property to save the "no-map" property of
reserved region and a new function lmb_reserve_flags() to check
this flag.
The default allocation use flags = LMB_NONE.
The adjacent reserved memory region are merged only when they have
the same flags value.
This patch is partially based on flags support done in Linux kernel
mm/memblock .c (previously lmb.c); it is why LMB_NOMAP = 0x4, it is
aligned with MEMBLOCK_NOMAP value.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add 2 configs CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS and CONFIG_LMB_RESERVED_REGIONS
to change independently the max number of the regions in lmb
library.
When CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS=y, move the lmb property arrays to
struct lmb and manage the array size with the element 'max' of struct
lmb_region; their are still allocated in stack.
When CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS=n, keep the current location in
struct lmb_region to allow compiler optimization.
Increase CONFIG_LMB_RESERVED_REGIONS is useful to avoid lmb errors in
bootm when the number of reserved regions (not adjacent) is reached:
+ 1 region for relocated U-Boot
+ 1 region for initrd
+ 1 region for relocated linux device tree
+ reserved memory regions present in Linux device tree.
The current limit of 8 regions is reached with only 5 reserved regions
in DT.
see Linux kernel commit bf23c51f1f49 ("memblock: Move memblock arrays
to static storage in memblock.c and make their size a variable")
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
|
|
Move MAX_LMB_REGIONS value in Kconfig, the max number of the regions
in lmb library.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
|
|
Add a max parameter in lmb_region struct to handle test
in lmb_add_region without using the MAX_LMB_REGIONS
define.
This patch allows to modify these size independently for
memory of reserved regions in the next patches.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
|
|
Remove the unused field size of struct lmb_region as it is initialized to 0
and never used after in lmb library.
See Linux kernel commit 4734b594c6ca ("memblock: Remove memblock_type.size
and add memblock.memory_size instead")
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
|
|
Since commit 86cf1c82850f ("configs: Migrate CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS") &
commit 999a772d9f24 ("Kconfig: Migrate CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS"),
CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS is always defined with a value (4 is default).
It makes no sense to still carry code that is guarded with
"#ifndef CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS" (and similar). This patch removes
all these unreferenced code paths.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
Dump lmb status from the bdinfo command. This is useful for seeing the
reserved memory regions from the u-boot cmdline.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
|
|
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Move this header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this uncommon header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present dm/device.h includes the linux-compatible features. This
requires including linux/compat.h which in turn includes a lot of headers.
One of these is malloc.h which we thus end up including in every file in
U-Boot. Apart from the inefficiency of this, it is problematic for sandbox
which needs to use the system malloc() in some files.
Move the compatibility features into a separate header file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This fixes the automatic lmb initialization and reservation for boards
with more than one DRAM bank.
This fixes the CVE-2018-18439 and -18440 fixes that only allowed to load
files into the firs DRAM bank from fs and via tftp.
Found-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Change multiple usages of 'j' into 'rgn'; fix whitespace/coding style
reported by patman.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
|
|
As a follow-up, change the name of the newly introduced function
'lmb_get_unreserved_size' to 'lmb_get_free_size', which is more
appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
[trini: Fix test/lib/lmb.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This fixes CVE-2018-18440 ("insufficient boundary checks in filesystem
image load") by using lmb to check the load size of a file against
reserved memory addresses.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This adds two new functions, lmb_alloc_addr and
lmb_get_unreserved_size.
lmb_alloc_addr behaves like lmb_alloc, but it tries to allocate a
pre-specified address range. Unlike lmb_reserve, this address range
must be inside one of the memory ranges that has been set up with
lmb_add.
lmb_get_unreserved_size returns the number of bytes that can be
used up to the next reserved region or the end of valid ram. This
can be 0 if the address passed is reserved.
Added test for these new functions.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
|
|
lmb_add_region handles overlapping regions wrong: instead of merging
or rejecting to add a new reserved region that overlaps an existing
one, it just adds the new region.
Since internally the same function is used for lmb_alloc, change
lmb_add_region to reject overlapping regions.
Also, to keep reserved memory correct after 'free', reserved entries
created by allocating memory must not set their size to a multiple
of alignment but to the original size. This ensures the reserved
region is completely removed when the caller calls 'lmb_free', as
this one takes the same size as passed to 'lmb_alloc' etc.
Add test to assert this.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
|
|
The lmb code fails if base + size of RAM overflows to zero.
Fix this by calculating end as 'base + size - 1' instead of 'base + size'
where appropriate.
Added tests to assert this is fixed.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
|
|
If a 32-bit system has 2GB of RAM, and the base address of that RAM is
2GB, then start+size will overflow a 32-bit value (to a value of 0).
__lmb_alloc_base is affected by this; it calculates the minimum of
(start+size of RAM) and max_addr. However, when start+size is 0, it
is always less than max_addr, which causes the value of max_addr not
to be taken into account when restricting the allocation's location.
Fix this by calculating start+size separately, and if that calculation
underflows, using -1 (interpreted as the max unsigned value) as the
value instead, and then taking the min of that and max_addr. Now that
start+size doesn't overflow, it's typically large, and max_addr
dominates the min() call, and is taken into account.
The user-visible symptom of this bug is that CONFIG_BOOTMAP_SZ is ignored
on Tegra124 systems with 2GB of RAM, which in turn causes the DT to be
relocated at the very end of RAM, which the ARM Linux kernel doesn't map
during early boot, and which causes boot failures. With this fix,
CONFIG_BOOTMAP_SZ correctly restricts the relocated DT to a much lower
address, and everything works.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
This not only looks a bit better it also prevents a
warning with W=1 (no previous prototype).
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Now that the other architecture-specific lib directories have been
moved out of the top-level directory there's not much reason to have the
'_generic' suffix on the common lib directory.
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
|
