| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Remove duplicated code in MPC8544DS board and utilize the common
fsl_pcie_init_ctrl(). We also now dynamically setup the LAWs for PCI
controllers based on which PCIe controllers are enabled.
We don't use the full fsl_pcie_init_ctrl() since we have to handle PCIE3
specially to setup the additional memory map region and we utilize a
single LAW to cover the controller.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
On 85xx platforms we shouldn't be using any LAWAR_* defines
but using the LAW_* ones provided by fsl-law.h. Rename any such
uses and limit the LAWAR_ to the 83xx platform as the only user so
we will get compile errors in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
The 8544 DS doesn't have any cacheable Local Bus memories set up. By mapping
space for some anyway, we were allowing speculative loads into unmapped space,
which would cause an exception (annoying, even if ultimately harmless).
Removing LBC_CACHE_BASE, and using LBC_NONCACHE_BASE for the LBC LAW solves the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
|
With the new LAW interface (set_next_law) we can move to letting the
system allocate which LAWs are used for what purpose. This makes life
a bit easier going forward with the new DDR code.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
