| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since there is now a new version of the FSP and it is incompatible with
the existing version, move the code into an fsp1 directory. This will
allow us to put FSP v2 code into an fsp2 directory.
Add a Kconfig which defines which version is in use.
Some of the code in this new fsp1/ directory is generic across both FSPv1
and FSPv2. Future patches will address this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
We use binman to build the x86 image now. Update a comment which still
refers to ifdtool.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
Built without a ROM image with FSP (u-boot.rom), the U-Boot loader applies
the microcode update data block encoded in Device Tree to the bootstrap
processor but not passed to the other CPUs when multiprocessing is enabled.
If the bootstrap processor successfully performs a microcode update
from Device Tree, use the same data block for the other processors.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Gorinov <ivan.gorinov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
[bmeng: fixed build errors on edison and qemu-x86]
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Each CPU needs to have its microcode loaded. Add support for this so that
all CPUs will have the same version.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
Add some comments in start.S for the fact that with FSP U-Boot
actually enters the code twice. Also change to use fsp_init()
and fsp_continue for accuracy.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The call to FspInitEntry is done in arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_car.S so far.
It worked pretty well but looks not that good. Apart from doing too
much work than just enabling CAR, it cannot read the configuration
data from device tree at that time. Now we want to move it a little
bit later as part of init_sequence_f[] being called by board_init_f().
This way it looks and works better in the U-Boot initialization path.
Due to FSP's design, after calling FspInitEntry it will not return to
its caller, instead it jumps to a continuation function which is given
by bootloader with a new stack in system memory. The original stack in
the CAR is gone, but its content is perserved by FSP and described by
a bootloader temporary memory HOB. Technically we can recover anything
we had before in the previous stack, but that is way too complicated.
To make life much easier, in the FSP continuation routine we just
simply call fsp_init_done() and jump back to car_init_ret() to redo
the whole board_init_f() initialization, but this time with a non-zero
HOB list pointer saved in U-Boot's global data so that we can bypass
the FspInitEntry for the second time.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Andrew Bradford <andrew.bradford@kodakalaris.com>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
For now this code seems to be the same for all FSP platforms. Make it
common until we see what differences are required.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
