diff options
author | Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com> | 2012-08-08 01:42:18 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> | 2012-09-02 17:55:56 +0200 |
commit | 3f4669334d3bfd795777c18423765210b9180278 (patch) | |
tree | edca47a0ca9a201cd1603145ce89eb9d98f0bf41 /doc | |
parent | 15c6935b0c8267d0cd70e18a0cf6e31345f50266 (diff) |
dm: Add Driver cores design document
Signed-off-by: Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/driver-model/UDM-cores.txt | 126 |
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/driver-model/UDM-cores.txt b/doc/driver-model/UDM-cores.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4e1318871a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/driver-model/UDM-cores.txt @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +The U-Boot Driver Model Project +=============================== +Driver cores API document +========================= + +Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com> + +1) Overview +----------- + Driver cores will be used as a wrapper for devices of the same type, and as + an abstraction for device driver APIs. For each driver API (which roughly + correspond to device types), there will be one driver core. Each driver core + will implement three APIs - a driver API (which will be the same as API of + drivers the core wraps around), a core API (which will be implemented by all + cores) and a command API (core-specific API which will be exposed to + commands). + + A) Command API + The command API will provide access to shared functionality for a specific + device, which is currently located mostly in commands. Commands will be + rewritten to be more lightweight by using this API. As this API will be + different for each core, it is out of scope of this document. + + B) Driver API + The driver API will act as a wrapper around actual device drivers, + providing a single entrypoint for device access. All functions in this API + have an instance* argument (probably called "this" or "i"), which will be + examined by the core, and a correct function for the specified driver will + get called. + + If the core gets called with a group instance pointer (as discussed in + design), it will automatically select the instance that is associated + with this core, and use it as target of the call. if the group contains + multiple instances of a single type, the caller must explicitly use an + accessor to select the correct instance. + + This accessor will look like: + struct instance *get_instance_from_group(struct instance *group, int i) + + When called with a non-group instance, it will simply return the instance. + + C) Core API + The core API will be implemented by all cores, and will provide + functionality for getting driver instances from non-driver code. This API + will consist of following functions: + + int get_count(struct instance *core); + struct instance* get_instance(struct instance *core, int index); + int init(struct instance *core); + int bind(struct instance *core, struct instance *dev, void *ops, + void *hint); + int unbind(struct instance *core, instance *dev); + int replace(struct instance *core, struct_instance *new_dev, + struct instance *old_dev); + int destroy(struct instance *core); + int reloc(struct instance *new_core, struct instance *old_core); + + The 'hint' parameter of bind() serves for additional data a driver can + pass to the core, to help it create the correct internal state for this + instance. the replace() function will get called during instance + relocation, and will replace the old instance with the new one, keeping + the internal state untouched. + + +2) Lifetime of a driver core +---------------------------- + Driver cores will be initialized at runtime, to limit memory footprint in + early-init stage, when we have to fit into ~1KB of memory. All active cores + will be stored in a tree structure (referenced as "Core tree") in global data, + which provides good tradeoff between size and access time. + Every core will have a number constant associated with it, which will be used + to find the instance in Core tree, and to refer to the core in all calls + working with the Core tree. + The Core Tree should be implemented using B-tree (or a similar structure) + to guarantee acceptable time overhead in all cases. + + Code for working with the core (i2c in this example) follows: + + core_init(CORE_I2C); + This will check whether we already have a i2c core, and if not it creates + a new instance and adds it into the Core tree. This will not be exported, + all code should depend on get_core_instance to init the core when + necessary. + + get_core_instance(CORE_I2C); + This is an accessor into the Core tree, which will return the instance + of i2c core, creating it if necessary + + core_bind(CORE_I2C, instance, driver_ops); + This will get called in bind() function of a driver, and will add the + instance into cores internal list of devices. If the core is not found, it + will get created. + + driver_activate(instance *inst); + This call will recursively activate all devices necessary for using the + specified device. the code could be simplified as: + { + if (is_activated(inst)) + return; + driver_activate(inst->bus); + get_driver(inst)->probe(inst); + } + + The case with multiple parents will need to be handled here as well. + get_driver is an accessor to available drivers, which will get struct + driver based on a name in the instance. + + i2c_write(instance *inst, ...); + An actual call to some method of the driver. This code will look like: + { + driver_activate(inst); + struct instance *core = get_core_instance(CORE_I2C); + device_ops = get_ops(inst); + device_ops->write(...); + } + + get_ops will not be an exported function, it will be internal and specific + to the core, as it needs to know how are the ops stored, and what type + they are. + + Please note that above examples represent the algorithm, not the actual code, + as they are missing checks for validity of return values. + + core_init() function will get called the first time the core is requested, + either by core_link() or core_get_instance(). This way, the cores will get + created only when they are necessary, which will reduce our memory footprint. |