treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

  It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

  void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

  #include <asm/u-boot.h>
  void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

  struct bd_info;
  void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

  <smpl>
  @@
  typedef bd_t;
  @@
  -bd_t
  +struct bd_info
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/bdinfo.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/bdinfo.c
index d8c64155f0..75611e2592 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/bdinfo.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/bdinfo.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void __weak board_detail(void)
 
 void arch_print_bdinfo(void)
 {
-	bd_t *bd = gd->bd;
+	struct bd_info *bd = gd->bd;
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR)
 	bdinfo_print_num("sramstart", (ulong)bd->bi_sramstart);