From 3b9f2ae11b90e49388fad24ef3fd2a0045f952fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Haavard Skinnemoen Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:31:01 +0200 Subject: AVR32: Fix atomic_add_unless() and atomic_sub_unless() These functions depend on "result" being initalized to 0, but "result" is not included as an input constraint to the inline assembly block following its initialization, only as an output constraint. Thus gcc thinks it doesn't need to initialize it, so result ends up undefined if the "unless" condition is true. This fixes an oops in sunrpc where the faulty atomics caused rpciod_up() to not start the workqueue as it should. Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/asm-avr32/atomic.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h b/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h index b9c2548a52f3..7ef3862a73d0 100644 --- a/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h +++ b/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int atomic_sub_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u) " mov %1, 1\n" "1:" : "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter) - : "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u) + : "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u), "1"(result) : "cc", "memory"); return result; @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u) " mov %1, 1\n" "1:" : "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter) - : "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u) + : "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u), "1"(result) : "cc", "memory"); } -- cgit v1.2.3