summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/memcontrol.h59
-rw-r--r--include/linux/virtio.h1
2 files changed, 50 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index fb5b2a41bd45..b6d0b68f5503 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -356,17 +356,54 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
return !cgroup_subsys_enabled(memory_cgrp_subsys);
}
-static inline unsigned long mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- bool in_low_reclaim)
+static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ unsigned long *min,
+ unsigned long *low)
{
+ *min = *low = 0;
+
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
- return 0;
+ return;
- if (in_low_reclaim)
- return READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.emin);
+ /*
+ * There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim.
+ * We are special casing this specific case here because
+ * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep
+ * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for
+ * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
+ * especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU)
+ * which would want to have effective values 0 for targeted reclaim
+ * but a different value for external reclaim.
+ *
+ * Example
+ * Let's have global and A's reclaim in parallel:
+ * |
+ * A (low=2G, usage = 3G, max = 3G, children_low_usage = 1.5G)
+ * |\
+ * | C (low = 1G, usage = 2.5G)
+ * B (low = 1G, usage = 0.5G)
+ *
+ * For the global reclaim
+ * A.elow = A.low
+ * B.elow = min(B.usage, B.low) because children_low_usage <= A.elow
+ * C.elow = min(C.usage, C.low)
+ *
+ * With the effective values resetting we have A reclaim
+ * A.elow = 0
+ * B.elow = B.low
+ * C.elow = C.low
+ *
+ * If the global reclaim races with A's reclaim then
+ * B.elow = C.elow = 0 because children_low_usage > A.elow)
+ * is possible and reclaiming B would be violating the protection.
+ *
+ */
+ if (root == memcg)
+ return;
- return max(READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.emin),
- READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.elow));
+ *min = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.emin);
+ *low = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.elow);
}
enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(struct mem_cgroup *root,
@@ -847,10 +884,12 @@ static inline void memcg_memory_event_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
{
}
-static inline unsigned long mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- bool in_low_reclaim)
+static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ unsigned long *min,
+ unsigned long *low)
{
- return 0;
+ *min = *low = 0;
}
static inline enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
index 15f906e4a748..7c075463c7f2 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct virtio_device {
bool config_enabled;
bool config_change_pending;
spinlock_t config_lock;
+ spinlock_t vqs_list_lock; /* Protects VQs list access */
struct device dev;
struct virtio_device_id id;
const struct virtio_config_ops *config;