diff options
author | Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> | 2021-10-28 12:04:59 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2021-10-28 16:30:07 -0700 |
commit | 087cba799ced0573df499ddd3b2d8777e50cfb62 (patch) | |
tree | ff95ba34b812039c5ea1e021290aaa4acc947415 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c | |
parent | 92274e24b01b331ef7a4227135933e6163fe94aa (diff) |
selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeleton
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet.
Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them
together.
In c48e51c8b07a ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"),
I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF
object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when
included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a
separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of
subtests.
Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using
light skeleton, and convert all existing users.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-7-memxor@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c index 831447878d7b..d490ad80eccb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c @@ -4,10 +4,11 @@ #include <test_progs.h> #include <network_helpers.h> #include "test_ksyms_module.lskel.h" +#include "test_ksyms_module.skel.h" -void test_ksyms_module(void) +void test_ksyms_module_lskel(void) { - struct test_ksyms_module *skel; + struct test_ksyms_module_lskel *skel; int retval; int err; @@ -16,8 +17,8 @@ void test_ksyms_module(void) return; } - skel = test_ksyms_module__open_and_load(); - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_ksyms_module__open_and_load")) + skel = test_ksyms_module_lskel__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_ksyms_module_lskel__open_and_load")) return; err = bpf_prog_test_run(skel->progs.load.prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL, (__u32 *)&retval, NULL); @@ -26,5 +27,36 @@ void test_ksyms_module(void) ASSERT_EQ(retval, 0, "retval"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->out_bpf_testmod_ksym, 42, "bpf_testmod_ksym"); cleanup: + test_ksyms_module_lskel__destroy(skel); +} + +void test_ksyms_module_libbpf(void) +{ + struct test_ksyms_module *skel; + int retval, err; + + if (!env.has_testmod) { + test__skip(); + return; + } + + skel = test_ksyms_module__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_ksyms_module__open")) + return; + err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.load), 1, &pkt_v4, + sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL, (__u32 *)&retval, NULL); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run")) + goto cleanup; + ASSERT_EQ(retval, 0, "retval"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->out_bpf_testmod_ksym, 42, "bpf_testmod_ksym"); +cleanup: test_ksyms_module__destroy(skel); } + +void test_ksyms_module(void) +{ + if (test__start_subtest("lskel")) + test_ksyms_module_lskel(); + if (test__start_subtest("libbpf")) + test_ksyms_module_libbpf(); +} |