diff options
author | Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> | 2016-09-15 10:55:20 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> | 2016-09-19 13:08:37 -0400 |
commit | 5fe6eaa1f9a00b9a5927e3b791ecad2f3eaab130 (patch) | |
tree | 3b5b516ef941eb91452458260d08b3473491913c /net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | |
parent | b9c5bc03be6aae41990efd09f83cf70a89ac9f4b (diff) |
SUNRPC: Generalize the RPC buffer allocation API
xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately.
TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR
buffers is transport implementation-specific.
Transports that want to allocate separate Call and Reply buffers
will ignore the "size" argument anyway. Don't bother passing it.
The buf_alloc method can't return two pointers. Instead, make the
method's return value an error code, and set the rq_buffer pointer
in the method itself.
This gives call_allocate an opportunity to terminate an RPC instead
of looping forever when a permanent problem occurs. If a request is
just bogus, or the transport is in a state where it can't allocate
resources for any request, there needs to be a way to kill the RPC
right there and not loop.
This immediately fixes a rare problem in the backchannel send path,
which loops if the server happens to send a CB request whose
call+reply size is larger than a page (which it shouldn't do yet).
One more issue: looks like xprt_inject_disconnect was incorrectly
placed in the failure path in call_allocate. It needs to be in the
success path, as it is for other call-sites.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c index bf168838a029..bd30b4b18d72 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c @@ -2533,23 +2533,28 @@ static void xs_tcp_print_stats(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct seq_file *seq) * we allocate pages instead doing a kmalloc like rpc_malloc is because we want * to use the server side send routines. */ -static void *bc_malloc(struct rpc_task *task, size_t size) +static int bc_malloc(struct rpc_task *task) { + struct rpc_rqst *rqst = task->tk_rqstp; + size_t size = rqst->rq_callsize; struct page *page; struct rpc_buffer *buf; - WARN_ON_ONCE(size > PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct rpc_buffer)); - if (size > PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct rpc_buffer)) - return NULL; + if (size > PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct rpc_buffer)) { + WARN_ONCE(1, "xprtsock: large bc buffer request (size %zu)\n", + size); + return -EINVAL; + } page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL); if (!page) - return NULL; + return -ENOMEM; buf = page_address(page); buf->len = PAGE_SIZE; - return buf->data; + rqst->rq_buffer = buf->data; + return 0; } /* |