| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
All objects under api/ and examples/api/ directories are selected
by CONFIG_API.
So we can move CONFIG_API switch to the top Makefile.
In order to use CONFIG_API, the definition of SUBDIR_EXAMPLES-y
must be moved after "sinlude $(obj)include/autoconf.mk".
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
tools/updater needs board/MAI/AmigaOneG3SE board
for compiling.
But AmigaOneG3SE board was already deleted
by Commit 953b7e6.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
CONFIG_IXP4XX_NPE is defined only for CPU ixp.
It is not necessary to filter by CPU ixp.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
CONFIG_FMAN_ENET is defined only for CPU mpc85xx.
We do not need to filter by CPU mpc85xx.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
We do not need to handle $(LIBBOARD) and $(LIBS) separately.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
We have converted all makefiles needed to build $(LIBS).
Until this commit we used to grep switch so that U-Boot style
and Kbuild style makefiles coexist.
But we do not need any more.
Goint forward, use always Kbuild style Makefile when adding
a new Makefile
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
This patch moves S5PC, EXYNOS specific directory entries
from the toplevel Makefile to arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile
using Kbuild descending feature.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
|
|
This patch moves OMAP specific directory entries
from the toplevel Makefile and spl/Makefile
to arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile using Kbuild descending feature.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
This patch moves Tegra specific directory entries
from the toplevel Makefile and spl/Makefile
to arch/arm/cpu/*/Makefile using Kbuild descending feature.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Tom Warren <TWarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
This commit moves some subdirectories of fs
from the toplevel Makefile to fs/Makefile
using Kbuild descending feature.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This commit moves some drivers subdirectory entry
from the toplevel Makefile to drivers/Makefile
using Kbuild descending feature.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Multiple targets are included in arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile
In order to refactor it,
we need to tweak Makefile and spl/Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|
Every makefile in sub directories has common lines
at the top and the bottom.
This commit pushes the common parts into script/Makefile.build.
Going forward sub-makefiles only need to describe this part:
COBJS := ...
COBJS += ...
SOBJS := ...
But using obj-y is preferable to prepare for switching to Kbuild.
The conventional (non-Kbuild) Makefile style is still supported.
This is achieved by greping the Makefile before entering into it.
U-Boot conventional sub makefiles always include some other makefiles.
So the build system searches a line beginning with "include" keyword
in the makefile in order to distinguish which style it is.
If the Makefile include a "include" line, we assume it is a conventional
U-Boot style. Otherwise, it is treated as a Kbuild-style makefile.
With this tweak, we can switch sub-makefiles
from U-Boot style to Kbuild style little by little.
obj-y := foo/
syntax (descending into the sub directory) is not supportd yet.
It will be implemented in the upcomming commit.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Previous process of compiling a PBL boot image is:
1: make <board_name_config>
2: make u-boot.pbl
for example:
make T4240QDS_SDCARD_config
make u-boot.pbl
Now the process is:
1: make <board_name>
for example:
make T4240QDS_SDCARD
Also, updated README.pblimage.
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
This patch add support for new multi function pmic max77693.
The driver is split into three modules: pmic, muic and fuelgage.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek <p.wilczek@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
|
|
In commit 27af930, the top Makefile was adjusted to the new
boards.cfg format.
But at the same time, -d option was added.
If you configure and make separately, for example
like follows:
make omap4_panda_config
make CROSS_COMPILE=<your_compiler_prefix>
it works fine as it did before.
But if you do them in one time like follows:
make omap4_panda CROSS_COMPILE=<your_compiler_prefix>
The log is sprinkled with annoying make debug messages.
This commit deletes -d option again.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
|
|
Fix various misspellings of things like "environment", "kernel",
"default" and "volatile", and throw in a couple grammar fixes.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Put all informations about targets, including state (active or
orphan) and maintainers, in boards.cfg; remove MAINTAINERS;
adjust the build system accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
tools/Makefile
|
|
Use of uImage formatted u-boot have long been preferred, and recent
changes to better support Falcon mode on MMC now enforces it on MMC.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Update the Makefiles so that all boards can use the same spl generation tool
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
|
|
Fix a bug introduced by commit 3aa29dee
TPL : introduce the TPL based on the SPL
Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
Due to the nand SPL on some board(e.g. P1022DS)has a size limit, it can
not be more than 4K. So, the SPL cannot initialize the DDR with the SPD
code. This patch introduces TPL to enable a loader stub that is loaded
by the code from the SPL. It initializes the DDR with the SPD or other
operations.
The TPL's size is sizeable, the maximum size is decided by the memory's
size that TPL runs. It initializes the DDR through SPD code, and copys
final uboot image to DDR. So there are three stage uboot images:
* spl_boot, * tpl_boot, * final uboot image
Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <b40530@freescale.com>
Acked-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the
autoconf.mk Makefile. As a result the build breaks when
CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the board-specific include header file. With
this, there is a possibility of having a CONFIG option defined in the
header file but not defined in the Makefile causing all kinds of build
failure and problems.
It also messes things for up, for example, when one might want to
undefine options to keep the SPL small and doesn't want to be stuck with
the CONFIG options used for U-boot. Lastly, this also avoids defining
special CONFIG_SPL_ variables for cases where some options are required
in U-boot but not in SPL.
We add a spl-autoconf.mk rule that is generated for SPL with the
CONFIG_SPL_BUILD flag and conditionally include it for SPL builds.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <b40530@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Fixup an easy conflict over adding the clk_get prototype and USB_OTG
defines for am33xx having moved.
Conflicts:
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/hardware.h
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Adding a new CONFIG_OMAP_COMMON which is included by all boards
that needs to build cpu/armv7/omap-common folder.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
|
|
Subsequent patches assume that dtc supports various recent features.
These are available in dtc 1.4.0. Validate that dtc is at least that
version.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Like many other projects, U-Boot has a tradition of including big
blocks of License headers in all files. This not only blows up the
source code with mostly redundant information, but also makes it very
difficult to generate License Clearing Reports. An additional problem
is that even the same lincenses are referred to by a number of
slightly varying text blocks (full, abbreviated, different
indentation, line wrapping and/or white space, with obsolete address
information, ...) which makes automatic processing a nightmare.
To make this easier, such license headers in the source files will be
replaced with a single line reference to Unique Lincense Identifiers
as defined by the Linux Foundation's SPDX project [1]. For example,
in a source file the full "GPL v2.0 or later" header text will be
replaced by a single line:
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
We use the SPDX Unique Lincense Identifiers here; these are available
at [2].
Note: From the legal point of view, this patch is supposed to be only
a change to the textual representation of the license information,
but in no way any change to the actual license terms. With this patch
applied, all files will still be licensed under the same terms they
were before.
Note 2: The apparent difference between the old "COPYING" and the new
"Licenses/gpl-2.0.txt" only results from switching to the upstream
version of the license which is differently formatted; there are not
any actual changes to the content.
Note 3: There are some recurring questions about linense issues, such
as:
- Is a "All Rights Reserved" clause a problem in GPL code?
- Are files without any license header a problem?
- Do we need license headers at all?
The following excerpt from an e-mail by Daniel B. Ravicher should help
with these:
| Message-ID: <4ADF8CAA.5030808@softwarefreedom.org>
| Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:35:22 -0400
| From: "Daniel B. Ravicher" <ravicher@softwarefreedom.org>
| To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
| Subject: Re: GPL and license cleanup questions
|
| Mr. Denk,
|
| Wolfgang Denk wrote:
| > - There are a number of files which do not include any specific
| > license information at all. Is it correct to assume that these files
| > are automatically covered by the "GPL v2 or later" clause as
| > specified by the COPYING file in the top level directory of the
| > U-Boot source tree?
|
| That is a very fact specific analysis and could be different across the
| various files. However, if the contributor could reasonably be expected
| to have known that the project was licensed GPLv2 or later at the time
| she made her contribution, then a reasonably implication is that she
| consented to her contributions being distributed under those terms.
|
| > - Do such files need any clean up, for example should we add GPL
| > headers to them, or is this not needed?
|
| If the project as a whole is licensed under clear terms, you need not
| identify those same terms in each file, although there is no harm in
| doing so.
|
| > - There are other files, which include both a GPL license header
| > _plus_ some copyright note with an "All Rights Reserved" clause. It
| > has been my understanding that this is a conflict, and me must ask
| > the copyright holders to remove such "All Rights Reserved" clauses.
| > But then, some people claim that "All Rights Reserved" is a no-op
| > nowadays. License checking tools (like OSLC) seem to indicate this is
| > a problem, but then we see quite a lot of "All rights reserved" in
| > BSD-licensed files in gcc and glibc. So what is the correct way to
| > deal with such files?
|
| It is not a conflict to grant a license and also reserve all rights, as
| implicit in that language is that you are reserving all "other" rights
| not granted in the license. Thus, a file with "Licensed under GPL, All
| Rights Reserved" would mean that it is licensed under the GPL, but no
| other rights are given to copy, modify or redistribute it.
|
| Warm regards,
| --Dan
|
| Daniel B. Ravicher, Legal Director
| Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) and Moglen Ravicher LLC
| 1995 Broadway, 17th Fl., New York, NY 10023
| (212) 461-1902 direct (212) 580-0800 main (212) 580-0898 fax
| ravicher@softwarefreedom.org www.softwarefreedom.org
[1] http://spdx.org/
[2] http://spdx.org/licenses/
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
